Open Access Article
Frontiers in Social Sciences DOI: .
*通讯作者： 无
发布时间: 2026-08-18 总浏览量: 26
Historic districts integrate architectural heritage, spatial patterns, traditional industries, and community life and are important carriers of urban cultural memory. Culture–tourism integration has expanded opportunities for their cultural presentation and public use but has also created problems such as commercial homogenization, the displacement of residents, and the staging of cultural settings for tourism. On the basis of comprehensive resource surveys and graded conservation, historic districts should develop locally distinctive products, adopt incremental approaches to regeneration, and improve mechanisms for resident participation, business-mix management, and cultural impact assessment. These measures can help coordinate heritage conservation, the continuity of community life, and tourism development.
[1] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. China Has Formally Recognized 67,200 Historic Buildings [EB/OL]. 202408-26.
[2] Ministry of Culture and Tourism of the People’s Republic of China. Domestic Tourism Data for 2024 [EB/OL]. 2025-01-22.
[3] Tao, X. D. “Strategies for Transforming the Regeneration Model of China’s Older Urban Areas: From Economically Oriented Redevelopment to Socially Oriented Urban Regeneration” [J]. Urban Development Studies, 2015, 22(4), 111–116, 124.
[4] Tan, J. J., Chang, J., & Xie, D. X. “Exploring the MicroRegeneration of Yongqing Fang on Enning Road in Guangzhou” [J]. Planners, 2018, 34(8), 62–67.
[5] Wang, X. Y. “The Rebirth of Old Districts: Strategies for Integrating Historical and Cultural Conservation with Urban Regeneration” [J]. Design, 2024, 9(6), 1383–1391.
投稿
审稿