Open Access Article
Contemporary Natural Sciences DOI: .
*通讯作者： 无
发布时间: 2026-08-19 总浏览量: 27
Antibiotics continuously enter aquatic environments through domestic sewage, hospital effluent, pharmaceutical wastewater, and runoff from livestock and aquaculture operations, subsequently migrating among the aqueous phase, suspended particulate matter, and sediments. This paper analyzes adsorption–desorption, hydrodynamic transport, photolysis, biodegradation, and related processes and compares biological treatment, adsorption, membrane separation, and advanced oxidation technologies. The findings indicate that pollution-control assessments should distinguish phase transfer, disappearance of the parent compound, and complete mineralization. Source reduction, combined treatment processes, and the integrated assessment of transformation products and antimicrobial-resistance risks should be strengthened.
[1] Li Z, Li M, Zhang Z, et al. Antibiotics in aquatic environments of China: A review and meta-analysis [J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 199: 110668.
[2] Kümmerer K. Antibiotics in the aquatic environment—A review—Part I [J]. Chemosphere, 2009, 75(4): 417–434.
[3] Watkinson A J, Murby E J, Costanzo S D. Removal of antibiotics in conventional and advanced wastewater treatment: Implications for environmental discharge and wastewater recycling [J]. Water Research, 2007, 41(18): 4164–4176.
[4] Adams C, Wang Y, Loftin K, et al. Removal of antibiotics from surface and distilled water in conventional water treatment processes [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2002, 128(3): 253–260.
[5] Homem V, Santos L. Degradation and removal methods of antibiotics from aqueous matrices—A review [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2011, 92(10): 2304–2347.
投稿
审稿