Open Access Article
Journal of Law and the Rule of Law DOI: DOI:10.64635/ja.2026.1539 .
*通讯作者: 无
发布时间: 2026-10-29 总浏览量: 2
生成式人工智能介入文字、图像和音乐创作后,作品形成过程由传统的人类直接表达转向人机协同, 著作权归属因此面临新的判断难题。现行著作权法仍以人的智力创作为保护基础,人工智能本身不具备作者 资格。对于人工智能辅助生成的内容,是否构成作品及权利归属于谁,应考察使用者是否对最终表达形成可 识别的实质性创作贡献。司法实践已经出现保护与不保护两种裁判结果。应建立以人类创作贡献为核心的分 层认定标准,并完善生成记录和权属证明规则。
With generative artificial intelligence increasingly involved in the creation of text, images, and music, the process of producing works has shifted from direct human expression to human–AI collaboration, giving rise to new challenges in determining copyright ownership. The current copyright law remains grounded in human intellectual creation, and artificial intelligence itself does not qualify as an author. For content generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence, whether it constitutes a copyrightable work and to whom the rights should belong should be determined by examining whether the user has made an identifiable and substantial creative contribution to the final expression. Judicial practice has already produced both protective and non-protective rulings. A tiered framework centered on human creative contribution should therefore be established, together with improved rules on generation records and proof of ownership.
[1] 全国人民代表大会常务委员会.中华人民共和国著作权法[Z].2020-11-11.
[2] 王迁.论人工智能生成的内容在著作权法中的定性[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2017,35(5):148-155.
[3] 易继明.人工智能创作物是作品吗?[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2017,35(5):137-147.
[4] 王迁.再论人工智能生成的内容在著作权法中的定性[J].政法论坛,2023,41(4):16-33.
[5] 徐小奔.论人工智能生成物的著作权法平等保护[J].中国法学,2024(1).
[6] 吴汉东.论人工智能生成内容的可版权性:实务、法理与制度[J].中国法律评论,2024(3):113-129.
[7] 张平.人工智能生成内容著作权合法性的制度难题及其解决路径[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2024,42(3):18-31.