关于我们

投稿

审稿

Open Access Article

Journal of Law and the Rule of Law DOI: DOI:10.64635/ja.2026.1543.

Practical Problems and Mechanism Optimization in the Functioning of the Administrative Reconsideration System
行政复议制度功能发挥中的现实问题与机制优化

作者: 申 浩  单位:河北外国语学院

*通讯作者: 无

发布时间: 2026-10-29 总浏览量: 0

摘要

行政复议兼具行政争议化解、公民权利救济和行政监督功能。新修订的《行政复议法》实施后,行政 复议案件数量持续增长,制度吸纳能力明显增强,但案件快速增加也暴露出审理资源承压、实质化解标准不清、 调解与依法裁决衔接不足及类案监督效能有限等问题。行政复议功能优化不能停留于扩大案件数量,应完善 争议导入和分流机制,提高事实调查与法律审查能力,规范调解和解程序,强化复议决定、意见书和建议书 的监督作用,并完善专业化队伍建设,实现权利救济、争议化解和依法行政监督的协调运行。

关键词: 行政复议;行政争议;权利救济;行政监督;实质化解

Abstract

Administrative reconsideration performs multiple functions, including resolving administrative disputes, providing remedies for citizens’ rights, and supervising administrative conduct. Since the implementation of the newly revised Administrative Reconsideration Law, the number of administrative reconsideration cases has continued to increase, significantly enhancing the system’s capacity to absorb and handle disputes. At the same time, the rapid growth in caseloads has exposed problems such as pressure on adjudicative resources, unclear standards for substantive dispute resolution, insufficient coordination between mediation and lawful adjudication, and limited effectiveness in supervising similar cases. Optimization of the administrative reconsideration system should not focus solely on increasing the number of cases accepted. Instead, mechanisms for dispute intake and diversion should be improved, fact-finding and legal review capabilities strengthened, mediation and settlement procedures standardized, and the supervisory functions of reconsideration decisions, opinions, and recommendations reinforced. Greater attention should also be given to building a professional workforce so as to achieve coordinated operation among rights protection, dispute resolution, and supervision of law-based administration.

Key words: administrative reconsideration; administrative disputes; rights protection; administrative supervision; substantive dispute resolution

参考文献 References

[1] 全国人民代表大会常务委员会.中华人民共和国行政复议法[Z].2023-09-01.

[2] 司法部.行政复议工作白皮书(2025)[R].202602-11.

[3]徐运凯.主渠道目标导向下新行政复议法的制度创新与理论解读[J].法律适用,2023(12):128-139.

[4]马怀德.行政复议前置的法理与适用[J].法律适用,2024(5):47-59.

[5]章志远.行政复议化解行政争议主渠道作用的实现进路[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025,47(6):39-51.

[6] 解志勇,阎静宇.主渠道语境下行政复议面临的挑战及其应对[J].江汉论坛,2026(1):113-120.

引用本文

申 浩, 行政复议制度功能发挥中的现实问题与机制优化[J]. 法律与法治 , 2026; 1: (1) :28-30.